<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why Gravitational Contraction Must be Accompanied by Emission of Radiation Both in Newtonian and Einstein Gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605066/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605066/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why Gravitational Contraction Must be Accompanied by Emission of Radiation Both in Newtonian and Einstein Gravity — mentioned by faizshah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8364191</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0605066:8364191</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:14:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not at all acquainted with astrophysics but I remember seeing an article state that there was a different physicist who proved this same thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7191324 A quick google shows his response to this: https://twitter.com/abhasmitra/status/514804101024997376 His response: &amp;quot;Hawking radiation is unproven. And particle physicists are not aware that even without any Quantum Mechanics, classical gravitation dictates that all gravitational collapse must be accompanied by radiation. : http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.024010…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0605066/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
