<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Note on Frame Dragging · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0509025/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0509025/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Note on Frame Dragging — mentioned by eesmith</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28114772</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0509025:28114772</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:17:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I deliberately chose something that just above trivially simple to show that there was diversity of expression even at that level. That is, even given a technical term with a precise agreed upon definition, the description of that term (eg, in English) does not have a precise agreed-upon form. Incorrect use of the latter may imply plagiarism, and this thread appears to concern that aspect. Most definitions are not as simple as &amp;quot;cosine similarity&amp;quot;. Your statement, if true, would mean that most dictionaries would use exactly the same words to describe a given, well-specified scientific…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0509025/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
