<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A non-singular black hole model as a possible end-product of gravitational collapse · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0506111/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0506111/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A non-singular black hole model as a possible end-product of gravitational collapse — mentioned by privong</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10211215</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0506111:10211215</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:54:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;ve not seen anything concrete that says you can&amp;#x27;t model a black-hole as a shell of mass. As I understand it, to an outside observer a shell behaves gravitationally identically to a point mass at the centre of such a shell would. &amp;gt; Of course, I&amp;#x27;m no doubt very wrong, but whenever I&amp;#x27;ve mentioned this to anyone, no one has really come up with anything to say it absolutely isn&amp;#x27;t possible, not without holding on to other things we &amp;#x27;think&amp;#x27; we know like matter &amp;#x27;should&amp;#x27; continue to collapse to infinite density once past some arbitrary point. Something I&amp;#x27;m not convinced is true. Sure, you can…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0506111/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
