<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Emergent Relativity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0302028/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0302028/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Emergent Relativity — mentioned by nabla9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18245211</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0302028:18245211</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 01:22:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert B. Laughlin (Nobel physicist mentioned in the article) has really unique viewpoint towards emergence vs reductionism. His book &amp;quot;A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down&amp;quot; is layman explanation of his ideas. Here is one of his recent papers: Emergent Relativity https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0302028.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0302028/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item><item><title>Emergent Relativity — mentioned by nabla9</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12238886</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0302028:12238886</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:14:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My second favorite more serious candidate is R. B. Laughlin&amp;#x27;s (Nobel price in physics and controversial guy) ideas of emergence. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302028&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0302028/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
