<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0204062/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0204062/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective — mentioned by gps372</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49621212</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0204062:49621212</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:58:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe I should have been clearer! There is also a possibility for Gravity to be quantum without gravitons https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0204062 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_gravity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity However, for me to claim that quantum Gravity is only emergent without a particle like graviton&amp;#x27;s mediation, I would need to present evidence. Just like this claim - quantum gravity is only possible from gravitons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0204062/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
