https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0202031/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45650856urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0202031:45650856Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:51:15 GMT<p>Think of it more like &quot;IRL raytracing&quot;, where a ray (the beam) is cast and the result for a single pixel from the point of view is captured, and then it is repeated millions of times. Even if you had a clock and camera for every pixel, the sync is dependent on the path of the signal taken. Even if you sent a signal along every possible route and had a clock for each route for each pixel (a dizzingly large number) it still isn&#x27;t clear that this would represent a single inertial frame. As I understand it even if you used quantum entanglement for sync, the path of the measurement would still be…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0202031/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>gr-qc