<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Regular coordinate systems for Schwarzschild and other spherical spacetimes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0001069/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0001069/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Regular coordinate systems for Schwarzschild and other spherical spacetimes — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44917769</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:gr-qc_0001069:44917769</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 22:02:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, not really. To boil it down to thinner text, and to focus on your &amp;quot;Space becomes timelike&amp;quot;, I think you are stuck on (a) a particular system of coordinates that (b) are not regular across the horizon and (c) thinking that either of these does anything physical to free-falling infalling test particle. The huge flashing red warning sign on (a) &amp;amp; (c) is that you drop in the words &amp;quot;&amp;#x27;upward&amp;#x27; direction&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;{toward, closer to, away from} the singularity&amp;quot; and most especially &amp;quot;slower&amp;quot;: you are clearly implicitly slicing spacetime into space and time. If you can handle thicker text, Unruh has a nice…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/gr-qc_0001069/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
