<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>P=NP · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0406056/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0406056/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>P=NP — mentioned by IvanK_net</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30191287</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cs_0406056:30191287</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:49:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a fun fact: there are dozens of papers released each year, which claim that they have proven that P=NP, or P is not equal NP. E.g. they &amp;quot;prove&amp;quot; it with soap bubbles: https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0406056.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0406056/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
