HackerPapers

arXiv:cs/0401019cs.OH

Using biased coins as oracles

Toby Ord, Tien D. Kieu

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

While it is well known that a Turing machine equipped with the ability to flip a fair coin cannot compute more that a standard Turing machine, we show that this is not true for a biased coin. Indeed, any oracle set $X$ may be coded as a probability $p_{X}$ such that if a Turing machine is given a coin which lands heads with probability $p_{X}$ it can compute any function recursive in $X$ with arbitrarily high probability. We also show how the assumption of a non-recursive bias can be weakened by using a sequence of increasingly accurate recursive biases or by choosing the bias at random from a distribution with a non-recursive mean. We conclude by briefly mentioning some implications regarding the physical realisability of such methods.

arXiv comments
11 pages
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.OHOther Computer Science quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2019 to Dec 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Finite memory just means a limited subset of what a Turing machine can do. Concurrency doesn't make Turing computable processes capable of anything beyond what they can already do. At best it buys them speed, maybe some expressiveness for the programmer, and bugs. Nondeterminism…

      itView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.