<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mapping Subsets of Scholarly Information · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0312018/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0312018/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mapping Subsets of Scholarly Information — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42043840</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cs_0312018:42043840</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:26:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A long time ago I got a paper with my name on it in PNAS because a professor I knew had been invited to submit one as part of a conference (bypassing the usual peer review) so I got together with another prof and a student and we smashed together a few student research projects into https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0312018 which I think is a good paper from the viewpoint of &amp;quot;correctness&amp;quot; but on another level isn&amp;#x27;t a normal research paper as it isn&amp;#x27;t about one project. A lot of weird stuff goes on like this in academic publishing. When I was studying physics I got invited to present at a CS conference…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0312018/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IR</category></item><item><title>Mapping Subsets of Scholarly Information — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35729958</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cs_0312018:35729958</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:54:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Smart RSS reader that, right now, ingests about 1000 articles a day and picks out 300 for me to skim. Since I helped write this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0312018 I was always asking &amp;quot;Why is RSS failing? Why do failing RSS readers keep using the same failing interface that keeps failing?&amp;quot; and thought that text classification was ready in 2004 for content-based recommendation, then I wrote https://ontology2.com/essays/ClassifyingHackerNewsArticles/ a few years ago, after Twitter went south I felt like I had to do something, so I did. Even though my old logistic regression classifier works…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0312018/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.IR</category></item></channel></rss>
