<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Monads for natural language semantics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0205026/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0205026/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Monads for natural language semantics — mentioned by jesuslop</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20775844</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cs_0205026:20775844</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:40:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That colloquium looked nice, I assume no slides are available? Barker is anouncing another seminar on deep learning and semantics, that looks intriguing from the attached public materials. I think that compsci furnishes ideas from formal language parsing that can be toy models of fragments of natural languages, Montague made a case in favour of formalizability. Wadler investigated monadic parsing and this can be an entry point for what is happening in linguistics. I have as reference arXiv:cs/0205026v1 added: on Barker seminar day 4 I see CCG derivations that are a close formalism of pregroup…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cs_0205026/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
