<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Economic returns of research: the Pareto law and its implications · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9809366/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9809366/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Economic returns of research: the Pareto law and its implications — mentioned by navanit</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=700247</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_9809366:700247</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:50:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s an implicit assumption in his argument that the mean is stable and finite. This need not be the case, and is often not the case with tail events under power-law distributions: http://navanitarakeri.com/Diversification.pdf Also see the following: Didier Sornette and Daniel Zajdenweber, The economic return of research: the Pareto law and its implications, European Physical Journal B, 8 (4), 653-664 (1999) here: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9809366 There&amp;#x27;s also an excellent (and old) study on whether restaurants with specialized menus did better than restaurants with diverified…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9809366/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
