<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>New Monte Carlo algorithms for classical spin systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9703179/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9703179/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>New Monte Carlo algorithms for classical spin systems — mentioned by honie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27867593</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_9703179:27867593</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:10:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have only skimmed through the article but spent a bit of time on the &amp;quot;simultaneous update&amp;quot; part because it caught my eyes. If I&amp;#x27;m not mistaken the author made a mistake in assuming that it&amp;#x27;s okay not modifying the spins in the first pass and then doing the update in the second pass, which would cause the system to approach a strange equilibrium with that flips between two states. For example, if you set the simulation temperature to well below that of the critical temperature of the system, a robust algorithm should eventually cause all of the spins align (to take the same sign). Also, and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_9703179/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat</category></item></channel></rss>
