<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0703002/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0703002/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Charge insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box — mentioned by itcrowd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21054583</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0703002:21054583</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:45:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Essentially, they use superconducting electronics to create a quantum circuit. It&amp;#x27;s not the same logic gates as a traditional computer chip and not based on the same physics. The details are difficult &amp;amp; messy. There are several reasons it doesn&amp;#x27;t scale easily to more qubits, but you can imagine that you don&amp;#x27;t want the chip to be large (must be cooled to 25mK!) but the qubits should be spaced quite far apart so they don&amp;#x27;t influence each other. Also, it&amp;#x27;s not a very simple circuit, so the layout of the transmission lines (&amp;quot;wire on a chip&amp;quot;) becomes difficult to manage. The last problem also…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0703002/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
