<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0412004/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0412004/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law — mentioned by 6502nerdface</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11050867</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0412004:11050867</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:37:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The distribution of income seems so unnatural Actually, what&amp;#x27;s striking to my mind is how mysteriously consistent the income distribution is with the same family of power law distributions (Zipf-Mandelbrot, Pareto, etc.) that describes such other, disparate, natural phenomena as the frequencies of words in natural languages [1], the sizes of cities [2], the sizes of asteroids [3], the abundances of species [4], the sizes of grains of sand on a beach [5], the magnitudes of earthquakes and avalanches [6], and many other things in the world. Anyway, my point is simply that the shape of the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0412004/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item><item><title>Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10875464</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:cond-mat_0412004:10875464</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:53:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0412004/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item><item><title>Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law — mentioned by Isamu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2391662</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0412004:2391662</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:22:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Mark wrote a paper about this I&amp;#x27;m interested. Is it: Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf&amp;#x27;s law, M. E. J. Newman, Contemporary Physics 46, 323–351 (2005). [link: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412004]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0412004/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
