<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Distributions of number of sexual partnerships have power law decaying tails and finite variance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0305528/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0305528/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Distributions of number of sexual partnerships have power law decaying tails and finite variance — mentioned by yummyfajitas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10499314</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0305528:10499314</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 13:21:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you think it&amp;#x27;s rare? Sweden is certainly a society of sexual inequality: http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0305528.pdf Various studies on social networks have shown that virtually every society has high friendship inequality. Maybe friendships also don&amp;#x27;t generate happiness? Unfortunately good studies are hard to come by - I&amp;#x27;ve never actually seen any. In virtually all cases, anchoring effects drown out the signal. But as a thought experiment, consider two individuals. One individual is a nerd in a frat house, watching a bunch of bros get laid while he&amp;#x27;s still a virgin. The other individual…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0305528/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.dis-nn</category></item></channel></rss>
