<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Absence of epidemic threshold in scale-free networks with connectivity correlations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0208163/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0208163/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Absence of epidemic threshold in scale-free networks with connectivity correlations — mentioned by atemerev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19907810</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0208163:19907810</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 08:45:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Real networks are not lattices; they have varied degree distributions. The famous result of Marián Boguña and Alessandro Vespignani shows, that for scale-free networks (which closely resemble the networks we see in the real world), the epidemic threshold could be arbitrarily low: https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0208163.pdf. I have also published some research among these lines: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.5815.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0208163/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.stat-mech</category></item></channel></rss>
