<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Simulations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0012334/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0012334/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Simulations — mentioned by balsam</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7788004</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:cond-mat_0012334:7788004</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 04:38:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you mean subexponential time? Which is not much of an improvement. This is a question which I would like someone like Scott Aaronson to answer. The sign problem is NP-hard[1]. So it&amp;#x27;s not currently believed that quantum computers can actually help with the sign problem [2]. On the other hand, we have papers that seem to say they could [3]. &amp;quot;today it seems extremely unlikely that quantum computers can solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time&amp;quot; -- Scott Aaronson [1] http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0408370.pdf [2] http://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bqpph.pdf [3]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/cond-mat_0012334/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat</category></item></channel></rss>
