<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9603009/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9603009/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science? — mentioned by cb321</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38698874</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:chao-dyn_9603009:38698874</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:50:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Bricmont does a good job of discussing entropy, arrow-of-time, and irreversibility, information and probability in a purely classical statistical mechanics setting in https://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9603009 . Bricmont has continued to write/expound upon these ideas ever since and more recently &amp;quot;come out&amp;quot; as a non-local hidden variables proponent of the de Broglie/Bohm variety which rejects your (1. locality) for which you left out an example. :-) Sometimes people refer to giving up &amp;quot;locality&amp;quot; in this context with the mouthful &amp;quot;a preferred fundamental foliation of spacetime&amp;quot;. { &amp;quot;fundamental&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9603009/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item><item><title>Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science? — mentioned by cb321</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31193262</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:chao-dyn_9603009:31193262</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:58:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Of possible related interest: https://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9603009 I think Bricmont is a clear thinker/presenter on these matters and this article actually showed up in a &amp;quot;for humanities people&amp;quot; anthology. [1] [1] https://www.amazon.com/Flight-Science-Reason-Academy-Science...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9603009/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item></channel></rss>
