<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Berry Paradox · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9406002/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9406002/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Berry Paradox — mentioned by joker3</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18117041</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:chao-dyn_9406002:18117041</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:37:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;While the Berry paradox isn&amp;#x27;t strictly speaking mathematically sensible, there are similar ideas that lead to new and less well-known impossibility results. https://arxiv.org/pdf/chao-dyn/9406002.pdf has a transcript of an overview of the idea and main results by the researcher who came up with them, as well as a fairly extensive bibliography. There&amp;#x27;s also a version of Russell&amp;#x27;s paradox lurking in the standard proof of Cantor&amp;#x27;s theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor%27s_theorem).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/chao-dyn_9406002/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nlin.CD</category></item></channel></rss>
