arXiv:astro-ph/9904401astro-ph
Limits on Stellar Objects as the Dark Matter of Our Halo: Nonbaryonic Dark Matter Seems to be Required
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
The nature of the dark matter in the Halo of our Galaxy remains a mystery. Arguments are presented that the dark matter does not consist of ordinary stellar or substellar objects, i.e., the dark matter is not made of faint stars, brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, or neutron stars. In fact, faint stars and brown dwarfs constitute no more than a few percent of the mass of our Galaxy, and stellar remnants must satisfy $Ω_{WD} \leq 3 \times 10^{-3} h^{-1}$, where $h$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km/s Mpc^{-1}. On theoretical grounds one is then pushed to more exotic explanations. Indeed a nonbaryonic component in the Halo seems to be required.
Are you indirectly asking whether planets can be dark matter candidates? If so, those are called MACHOs (massive compact halo objects). They have been studied via the gravitational microlensing effect. The presence of MACHOs can't account for most dark matter.…
xenophonfView on HNParent context