<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9803097/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9803097/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18636502</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_9803097:18636502</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 18:00:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m afraid I&amp;#x27;m gonna have to drop the ball on discussion of extended objects. I can&amp;#x27;t shake the seeming-realization that restorative forces within the extended object must generate a gravitational backreaction, and down that path lies too much math to write down first (in order to summarize later), and I don&amp;#x27;t trust that starting with an English description avoids a gross mis-characterization. However, I made a point about the expansion being in the curvature scalar, and Carroll has a lecture which supports this view for lambdavacuum (eqn 15 at…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9803097/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item><item><title>The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15445106</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_9803097:15445106</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:34:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;usable link&amp;quot; How much technical detail do you want? Starting with the &amp;quot;gimme hardcore!&amp;quot; end, I was thinking of how to construct an argument using vierbiens and then how to boil it down to something accessible (or at least representable on LaTeX-free HN), and then remembered that it had already been done by Cooperstock et al.: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/9803097 The tl;dr is that if the cosmological expansion induces strain on matter, the strain is too small to be measurable. Retreating from the hardest of answers, Peter Coles has an old moderate-detail article on this at…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9803097/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
