<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cosmology with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9710335/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9710335/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cosmology with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) — mentioned by aeneasmackenzie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32420992</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_9710335:32420992</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 02:52:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The MOND guys are aware: https://tritonstation.com/2022/07/21/jwst-twitter-bender/ Specifically this paper[0] is mentioned as predicting it &amp;gt; Remarkably, the data roughly follow the green line, which is an L* galaxy magically put in place at the inconceivably high redshift of z=10. Galaxies seem to have gotten big impossibly early. This is why you see us astronomers flipping our lids at the JWST results. Can’t happen. &amp;gt; Except that it can, and was predicted[0] to do so by Bob Sanders a quarter century ago: “Objects of galaxy mass are the first virialized objects to form (by z=10) and larger…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9710335/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
