<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dipole Anisotropy in the COBE DMR First-Year Sky Maps · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9312056/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9312056/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dipole Anisotropy in the COBE DMR First-Year Sky Maps — mentioned by Certified</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41249458</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_9312056:41249458</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:09:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like all the caveats and the time taken to explain things in the first part of that document, but later it starts to rush and gloss over important details and caveats. On page 151 of that link, when it starts talking about using parallax to measure the distance to nearby stars, it says &amp;quot;However, if one takes measurements six months apart, one gets a distance separation of 2AU.&amp;quot; This is obviously incorrect because the whole solar system is orbiting around the galactic core, which itself is moving with respect to the CMB rest frame. I did a quick calc based on the 552.2 km/s galactic…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_9312056/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
