<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Note on Varying Speed of Light Cosmologies · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0703751/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0703751/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Note on Varying Speed of Light Cosmologies — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32171412</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0703751:32171412</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:02:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;1/2 tl;dr: coincident-events first, then labels (coordinates). [Einstein 1916, p.117 [2] although I remembered to look there only after writing all of the below]. One-way speed of light arguments are in danger of being coordinates-first, and thus insufficiently general for physics.[3] The key word in your comment is &amp;gt; directly But why do we care? We have an abundance of indirect evidence, premised on direct tests of coordinate-independent features of our best most-fundamental theory. The two important features of (general) relativity are pointwise local Lorentz covariance -- where c is the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0703751/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item><item><title>Note on Varying Speed of Light Cosmologies — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15108807</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0703751:15108807</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2017 02:48:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#x27;s flip the question and ask what happens if we let the value of c depend on the location in spacetime. Ellis provides a &amp;quot;short checklist of issues that should be satisfactorily handled by&amp;quot; theories that have a value of c that depends on location in spacetime. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0703751 The tl;dr version is that relativistic physical theories will need revising because in the face of a location-dependent c, and in particular the problem arises because we necessarily break lengths and durations when c is not everywhere-and-everywhen identical. More narrowly observables like…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0703751/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
