<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Modelling the Pioneer anomaly as modified inertia · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612599/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612599/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Modelling the Pioneer anomaly as modified inertia — mentioned by apsec112</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11537824</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0612599:11537824</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:17:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t think there&amp;#x27;s anything real here. McCulloch&amp;#x27;s papers on arXiv seem very confused. Eg., this paragraph: &amp;quot;In this scheme there is a minimum allowed acceleration which depends on a Hubble scale Θ, so, if Θ has increased in cosmic time, there should be a positive correlation between the anomalous centripetal acceleration seen in equivalent galaxies, and their distance from us, since the more distant ones are seen further back in time when, if the universe has indeed been expanding, Θ was smaller. The mass to light ratio (M/L) does seem to increase as we look further away. The M/L ratio of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612599/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
