<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612072/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612072/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae — mentioned by MereInterest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37198338</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0612072:37198338</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:07:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Stable states are likely not all that hot, but what about supernova? As context first, at some point temperature just sort of, stops being useful as a comparison. Not because it can&amp;#x27;t be computed, but because there really isn&amp;#x27;t any point of comparison for it. The coldest temperature in Antarctica was -89.2 Celsius [0]. The hottest day in Death Valley was 56.7 Celsius [1]. Tungsten melts at 3400 Celsius [2]. And papers about supernova will casually throw around phrases like &amp;quot;for temperatures exceeding a few 100 keVs&amp;quot; [3], to state that pretty much everything that happens in a supernova will…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0612072/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
