<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cosmic Rays from Gamma Ray Bursts in the Galaxy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0504158/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0504158/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cosmic Rays from Gamma Ray Bursts in the Galaxy — mentioned by nitid_name</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8397004</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0504158:8397004</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:17:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a paper published on a model for the GRB that would have caused that event! http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504158 When the GLAST (now James Webb Telescope) data came in, it pointed to a small (~1%) anisotropy of UHE GRBs toward high metalicity galaxies. Our model was completely isotropic. Unfortunately, we didn&amp;#x27;t have time to rework the anisotropy into our model&amp;#x27;s assumptions before our funding fell through. ... and that is the story of my brief experience as a scientist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0504158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
