<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The diameters of Alpha Centauri A and B - A comparison of the asteroseismic and VINCI/VLTI views · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0303634/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0303634/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The diameters of Alpha Centauri A and B - A comparison of the asteroseismic and VINCI/VLTI views — mentioned by joshvm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44402225</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0303634:44402225</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 03:57:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s a lot easier to reason about this using angular resolution, because that&amp;#x27;s normally what the diffraction limit formula is in reference to. If you know the angular diameter of the system (α) and the wavelength (say λ=500 nm for visible), you can use α ≈ λ/d and solve for the aperture of the telescope (d). That puts a basic limit on the smallest thing you can resolve with a given aperture. You can use the angular diameter of the planet and the resolution you&amp;#x27;re after. For Alpha Centauri A it&amp;#x27;s 8.5 milli arc-second, so O(1 μas) for a 100px image? That&amp;#x27;s just for the star! The Event Horizon…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0303634/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
