HackerPapers

arXiv:astro-ph/0301145astro-ph

Propagation Speed of Gravity and the Relativistic Time Delay

Clifford M. Will

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We calculate the delay in the propagation of a light signal past a massive body that moves with speed v, under the assumption that the speed of propagation of the gravitational interaction c_g differs from that of light. Using the post-Newtonian approximation, we consider an expansion in powers of v/c beyond the leading ``Shapiro'' time delay effect, while working to first order only in Gm/c^2, and show that the altered propagation speed of the gravitational signal has no effect whatsoever on the time delay to first order in v/c beyond the leading term, although it will have an effect to second and higher order. We show that the only other possible effects of an altered speed c_g at this order arise from a modification of the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) coefficient α_1 of the metric from the value zero predicted by general relativity. Current solar-system measurements already provide tight bounds on such a modification. We conclude that recent measurements of the propagation of radio signals past Jupiter are sensitive to α_1, but are not directly sensitive to the speed of propagation of gravity.

arXiv comments
Revised, 15 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
Journal reference
Astrophys.J. 590 (2003) 683-690
DOI
doi:10.1086/375164
Subjects
astro-phAstrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2021 to Sep 2021.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • This is an excellent question, which predates the theory of General Relativity by a few years, and has only been astrophysically verified after 1974 (Hulse-Taylor) or even later. As far as I am aware, a complete theoretical answer in General Relativity itself is still elusive.…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.