<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Clusters of galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0212293/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0212293/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Clusters of galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) — mentioned by ravi-delia</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27100331</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0212293:27100331</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 22:16:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It really depends on your choice of modified gravity. Normal MOND isn&amp;#x27;t extended to relativity, and your choice of how to do that is going to make some big differences. I found [this](https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0212293) paper from a pro-mond researcher that found a non-relavistic model couldn&amp;#x27;t account for the behavior of dense galactic clusters like the bullet cluster, and there are plenty of papers by less sympathetic researchers that agree. I couldn&amp;#x27;t find any non proof of concept papers that tested relativistic extensions of MOND for bullet-cluster-esq situations. Those proof of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0212293/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
