<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for a Standard Energy Reservoir · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0102282/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0102282/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for a Standard Energy Reservoir — mentioned by throwaway_yy2Di</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7795560</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:astro-ph_0102282:7795560</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 05:26:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably not from one of these magnetar quakes. The one described in the articled released 10^39 J of x-rays; the typical gamma-ray burst is estimated to be 10^44 J, and moreover, concentrated in a narrow beam. If you&amp;#x27;re in the path of a GRB, it&amp;#x27;s looks as bright as a 10^45 - 10^47 J isotropic source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGR_1806-20 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst#Energetics_and... http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0102282 (ref [69] from the previous; page 20 in particular) So, if the article you link to estimates a GRB would be an extinction event within &amp;lt;6,000 light…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/astro-ph_0102282/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
