Invariant Primes in Lubin-Tate Space and Hovey-Strickland at Every Height · HackerPapers discussions

Invariant Primes in Lubin-Tate Space and Hovey-Strickland at Every Height — mentioned by guyomes

Sat, 24 Oct 2026 12:32:21 GMT

Another anecdotal data from an arxiv preprint [0]: "After the paper was written, the author learned that the same result was also proved independently and by a different method by Ningyi Li [7]. The result is also contained in a paper [8] released by OpenAI on October 6, 2026, in which the proof strategy and specific choices of notation are identical to a preliminary version of the present paper that was uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8, 2026." So not only did OpenAI publish a proof similar to one discussed on ChatGPT, but also there were other possible strategies to prove the result, that…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Invariant Primes in Lubin-Tate Space and Hovey-Strickland at Every Height — mentioned by pred_

Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:15:38 GMT

Let us not forget that there's much more to this than just OpenAI being lazy and incompetent and willingly ignoring the high standards that researchers usually holds themselves to. There's also the case of ethical violations, straight up scientific misconduct, as when OpenAI steals results of others (their customers) and present them as their own. One particularly bad one came yesterday: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10072 > The result is also contained in a paper [8] released by OpenAI on October 6, 2026, in which the proof strategy and specific choices of notation are identical to a…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Invariant Primes in Lubin-Tate Space and Hovey-Strickland at Every Height — HN submission

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:41:36 GMT

Invariant Primes in Lubin-Tate Space and Hovey-Strickland at Every Height

4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.