<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comprehension Audits to Mitigate Risks from Automated AI Research · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2610.10064/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2610.10064/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comprehension Audits to Mitigate Risks from Automated AI Research — mentioned by ronbodkin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50009268</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2610.10064:50009268</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:50:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Author here. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10064 AI now writes most of the code at frontier AI developers. Anthropic says Claude leads 26% of its R&amp;amp;D, and staff there and at OpenAI describe losing track of what the models built. Every proposal for pacing self-improvement gates on the AI (capability evals, compute caps, a lag before a model does AI R&amp;amp;D). None gates on whether the people responsible can still explain the work. In comprehension audits independent auditors are embedded at an AI developer and watch its workstream. They pick a contribution: a meaningful unit of R&amp;amp;D output…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2610.10064/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Comprehension Audits to Mitigate Risks from Automated AI Research — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50008399</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2610.10064:50008399</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:58:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Comprehension Audits to Mitigate Risks from Automated AI Research&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2610.10064/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
