<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Calibrated Decisions at Scale: Converting Police Crash Narratives into Probabilistic Crash Variables with a System One Model (Jev) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.24052/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.24052/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Calibrated Decisions at Scale: Converting Police Crash Narratives into Probabilistic Crash Variables with a System One Model (Jev) — mentioned by olooney</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49824215</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2609.24052:49824215</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:41:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought about writing a blog post that used Jev as a jumping off point to talk about calibration metrics[1], when and why calibration is important[2], and various methods for doing post hoc recalibration[3] of poorly calibrated models. I thought it would be interesting and instructive to benchmark Jev&amp;#x27;s claims about calibration, find examples where it wasn&amp;#x27;t (relative to some data set, which shouldn&amp;#x27;t be hard to find), give an example of how its poor calibration could be exploited, and then show how it could be fixed with, say, isotonic regression. That would give practitioners a roadmap to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.24052/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
