HackerPapers

arXiv:2609.20803math.AP

Regularity of asymptotically axisymmetric solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with analytic forcing

Peter Constantin, Mihaela Ignatova, Vlad Vicol

Abstract

OpenAI~\cite{OpenAIManuscript} has recently announced a proof of finite time singularity formation for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, in the presence of a $C^\infty$-smooth body force. The construction in~\cite{OpenAIManuscript} has a few key features, among which we single out: (i) the angular mean of the solution satisfies specific Type II bounds which are anisotropic; (ii) the solution is exactly axisymmetric in a collapsing core region. In this paper we consider solutions of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in the presence of a real-analytic body force, and assume that these solutions satisfy properties (i) and (ii) above. We prove that such solutions are in fact regular at the putative singular point. As a consequence, in the construction of~\cite{OpenAIManuscript}, and in any construction with properties (i) and (ii) whose force remains bounded in $C^2$ up to the singular time, the force can neither vanish identically near the singular point, nor be real analytic in the space variables, locally uniformly in time. The main idea of the proof is inspired by our earlier work~\cite{CIV26} and the companion paper~\cite{CIVEulerLength}: zooming-in at the putative singularity using the anisotropic length scales provided by the a priori bounds, we arrive at ancient limits whose PDE evolution imposes additional rigidity.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.APAnalysis of PDEs

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Sep 2026 to Oct 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • I’ve been a math professor for about ten years, and I think people outside the field misread what makes mathematicians angry, sad, and worried. Interviews that make it into the media tend to go with “AI is killing mathematics,” maybe because that gets clicks. The reality is more…

      paulcetonView on HNParent context

    • There is already a pre-print making the claim that the Navier-Stokes solution provided by OpenAI does not meet the criteria required by the prize (https://arxiv.org/html/2609.20803v1) (and as noted on Wikipedia, the Clay institute still lists the problem as 'active' not solved…

      dwrobertsView on HNParent context

    • Not really - if you read beyond the headlines of "mathematicians don't like AI", and your own imagined (incorrect) reasons they may have for that "AI is stupid", then the truth seems a bit more interesting. If you want to abide by your own words and judge the situation on it's…

      HarHarVeryFunnyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.