<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.13009/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.13009/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731620</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2609.13009:49731620</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 19:19:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How good are frontier models at physics?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;100 points; 50 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.13009/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken Evaluations and Near-Saturation of Leading Benchmarks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49693488</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2609.13009:49693488</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:07:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How Good Are Frontier Models at Physics? Expert Re-Grading Reveals Broken&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2609.13009/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
