<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bounded gaps between primes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bounded gaps between primes — mentioned by ggcr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49608026</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2608.31126:49608026</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:48:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminds me, kinda, to when Astra was launched and OpenAI announced an improvement to the bounded prime gap. Which BTW, Prof. Julia Stadlmann had published an independent result only a few days earlier Stadlmann improved it from 246 to 240, OpenAI later claimed 186 I think? Maybe someone can help clarify? I am no expert at all, but I can&amp;#x27;t help but see similarities. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31126&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>Bounded gaps between primes — mentioned by ks2048</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49555642</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2608.31126:49555642</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:41:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Context - according to Wikipedia [0], just a few days ago someone posted a proof of a bound of 240 [1]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_prime [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31126&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>Bounded gaps between primes — mentioned by Cu3PO42</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49555621</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2608.31126:49555621</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:40:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just two days ago, a preprint by Julia Stadlmann went up on arXiv [0] improving the prime gap from 246 to 240. Now OpenAI announces Astra has shown a gap of 186 [1]. That must really blow. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31126 [1] https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/51126fac-1b68-4128-9666-c908bcc16...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>Bounded gaps between primes — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49521701</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2608.31126:49521701</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 13:24:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Bounded gaps between primes – Julia Stadlmann&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.31126/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
