<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FLARE: Verifying MILP Reformulations with LLM-Based Theorem Proving · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.25220/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.25220/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>FLARE: Verifying MILP Reformulations with LLM-Based Theorem Proving — mentioned by henryrobbins00</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569603</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2608.25220:49569603</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:07:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in February, I was talking with my PhD advisor about using Lean to formally verify automated optimization modeling outputs. It eventually turned into this paper [1]. It’s been truly incredible to see how much the frontier models have progressed in both autoformalization and automated theorem proving in the last six months. Back in February, it was cool to see them prove the validity of some simple cutting planes. Now it can churn out a min-cut max-flow duality formalization (not to mention FLT). Very exciting times! I’ll also share a Python package I wrote for automated theorem proving…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.25220/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>FLARE: Verifying MILP Reformulations with LLM-Based Theorem Proving — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49468728</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2608.25220:49468728</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:58:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Flare: Verifying MILP Reformulations with LLM-Based Theorem Proving&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.25220/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
