<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.13545/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.13545/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure — mentioned by montebicyclelo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317923</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2608.13545:49317923</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 08:05:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Really cool work. I guess the area of scrutiny is the text filtering, where training text is filtered to get to `&amp;lt;=fifth_grade` material. I would have liked to have seen examples of what is in this training set, but paper [1] seems to only show examples of what was excluded, and dataset doesn&amp;#x27;t look like it&amp;#x27;s been released yet. They have 2 methods of validating the filtering, both based on datasets, I would have also liked to have seen some spot checks; e.g. randomly sample some text from the dataset, and get a human to say whether they think it&amp;#x27;s &amp;lt;=fifth_grade or not. (They do imply in the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2608.13545/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
