HackerPapers

arXiv:2608.09699cs.CR

Full-Key Recovery and Forgery from One MQOM v2.1 Signature

José Luis Delgado

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We give a full-key-recovery attack on MQOM v2.1, a Round-3 candidate in the NIST additional-signature process, that recovers the complete signing key from one accepted signature and uses it to sign a fresh message. If $δ=\operatorname{FirstBits}_λ(x)$ is the prefix of the witness $x$, the sibling path determines a public value $A$ such that tree parity gives $s=δ\oplus A$. Substitution into the hidden-leaf commitment yields $$\mathsf{Enc}_K(δ\oplus A)=T\oplus\mathsf{LinOrtho}(δ)$$ with public values $K$ and $T$. The correction in the same signature expands a solution into a complete witness, while the public MQ relation identifies those yielding valid signing keys; serializing such a witness gives the secret key, enabling a fresh-message signature accepted by the reference verifier. We evaluate this equation over the specified AES/Rijndael circuits using retained circuit state along a Gray traversal. Complete-domain scans for Categories I and V cost $2^{142.335112}$ and $2^{271.794162}$ Boolean gates. Category-III scans cover $1/2+2^{-20}$ and $0.580004770183$ of the domain at costs of $2^{206.774558}$ and $2^{206.988685}$ gates. All four totals are below the NIST security benchmarks. Reduced-domain runs against the reference implementation recover the byte-exact witness and key in all three categories and produce a fresh-message forgery accepted by the reference verifier. Independently generated source-syntax circuits evaluate the fixed ciphers over the stated domains and translated L3 prefixes, while an exact ideal-cipher factorial-moment bound controls additional equation preimages passed to public-key validation. Every value in the equation is fixed by the accepted transcript, so salt-bound global-root expansion changes its public constants without removing the one-signature recovery channel.

arXiv comments
The separation against generic search was deemed not enough. As such, the attack is not considered to affect MQOM security
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2026 to Aug 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.