HackerPapers

arXiv:2608.00280cs.OS

Benchmarking LLMs on File System Design and Implementation

Yuqi Xue, Daixuan Li, Jian Huang

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are fundamentally transforming computer system research and development. As we employ LLMs in file system (fs) development, it is essential to understand their capabilities, limitations, and operational efficiency for domain-specific tasks. We present φ-Bench, an LLM benchmarking framework for fs-specific tasks. To facilitate benchmarking, we develop six types of tasks in φ-Bench: basic understanding, basic implementation, performance modeling, debugging, optimization, and new feature development. Each type emphasizes different LLM capabilities: instruction following, knowledge recall, reasoning, or coding. To create high-quality tasks while achieving broad coverage with minimal human effort, we develop a new AI-assisted task generation pipeline in addition to expert-written and textbook-adapted tasks. With 505 tasks in φ-Bench, we conduct an empirical study with both open source (DeepSeek-V4-Flash, GLM-5.1, and MiniMax-M2.7) and proprietary (Claude-Opus-4.7, GPT-5.2, and Gemini-3.1-Pro) LLMs. Our study discloses the model efficiency for different tasks, causes of failed fs tasks, and techniques for mitigating LLM failures. We will open source φ-Bench to facilitate public research on using LLMs for fs development.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.OSOperating Systems cs.SESoftware Engineering

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2026 to Aug 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.