<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.26637/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.26637/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49337475</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2607.26637:49337475</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:52:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Open Protocol for Knowledge/Memory Management&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently, I got to thinking about what it might look like to open-source the core fundamentals of my AllSign project. As I fell further and further down that conceptual rabbit hole, it occurred to me that those core fundamentals are actually a really good solution to a problem I saw with agent memory. I read this paper called &amp;quot;Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents&amp;quot;, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26637, which concluded (rightfully so) that &amp;quot;information gathering and organization does not automatically get you intelligence&amp;quot;. I agree. I thought to myself, what&amp;#x27;s missing is &amp;quot;curation&amp;quot;. Something…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.26637/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
