<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cost-Effective Agent Harnesses for Abstract Reasoning and Generalization on ARC-AGI-1 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.06764/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.06764/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cost-Effective Agent Harnesses for Abstract Reasoning and Generalization on ARC-AGI-1 — mentioned by Legend2440</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948617</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2607.06764:48948617</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:32:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, you are misunderstanding the paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06764 The base model got 15%. They built an elaborate looping harness that allows it to burn 100k tokens &amp;quot;thinking&amp;quot; about the problem, which got the 57%. This is just an alternative approach to reasoning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2607.06764/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
