<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Habituation at the Gate: Rising Approval and Declining Scrutiny in Human Review of AI Agent Code · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.22721/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.22721/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Habituation at the Gate: Rising Approval and Declining Scrutiny in Human Review of AI Agent Code — mentioned by utopiah</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49854960</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.22721:49854960</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:59:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Maybe the model is just getting better, and maybe I&amp;#x27;m being less careful while under pressure to ship more and more often. But model capability is obviously growing. If you are a normal person research (e.g. https://arxiv.org/html/2606.22721v1 but there are a lot more, not necessarily on coding) has shown that you indeed are being less careful. It most likely also works better simply because more resources are being poured in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.22721/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
