<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>N-Version Programming with Coding Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.20158/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.20158/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>N-Version Programming with Coding Agents — mentioned by camgunz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48996300</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.20158:48996300</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:37:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; You aren’t thinking this through. No need to be so polite; I might just be very stupid. &amp;gt; You were just told that this wasn’t stacking but you keep insisting it is. Having an LLM generate something and then asking another LLM to generate that something is asking for 2 hallucinations, not 1. This doesn&amp;#x27;t go away the more LLMs you throw in there. The only reason this works at all for things like ChatGPT is their prompts are super different (and the editor LLM is way cheaper, of course). And you still have to check for hallucinations (before you say throw another hallucinating LLM at it know I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.20158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
