<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.17454/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.17454/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories — mentioned by gaurav71531</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48601265</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.17454:48601265</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:58:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We show that a simple harness fixing &amp;#x27;intent-execution gap&amp;#x27; achieves SOTA pass@1 on 21 models (across diverse model providers of Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Qwen) on agentic benchmarks (SWE-Pro, -verif, tb2). This is first time a single open-source harness reproduce/improve results on popular benchmarks for modern LLMs! The code is public to try and build-on: Code: https://github.com/strands-labs/benchmark-harnesses More importantly, we also generated 138k high-quality agent trajectories (SOTA pass@1) and present a detailed study on them &amp;quot;Dissecting model behavior through agent trajectories&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.17454/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
