<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models — mentioned by msdz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49323097</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.16140:49323097</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:57:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, even if it will be interesting to see whether things continue to develop in such a direction or not. &amp;gt; There&amp;#x27;s a version of this future where the model card stops listing a knowledge cutoff at all, because what&amp;#x27;s left in the weights goes stale on a scale of years instead of weeks. Future? Even just recently I’ve read of two approaches to this problem: Cactus have come up with Needle [0][1], which is their tool-calling focused 14 MB model (still an LLM!) – no world knowledge engrained. And instead of say, tool call structure, VibeThinker [2][3] focuses on reasoning over world…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639240</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2606.16140:48639240</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:01:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;VibeThinker: 3B param model that beats Opus 4.5 on reasoning with novel SFT+GRPO&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;398 points; 205 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models — mentioned by moondistance</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562121</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2606.16140:48562121</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:09:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.16140&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48554065</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2606.16140:48554065</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:18:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small LLMs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2606.16140/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
