HackerPapers

arXiv:2606.09135cs.CR

Steganography Without Modification: Hidden Communication via LLM Seeds

Felix Mächtle, Jonas Sander, Sebastian Berndt, Ben Weimar, Nils Loose, Thomas Eisenbarth

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We demonstrate that widely deployed Large Language Model (LLM) inference stacks harbor a steganographic channel that requires no modification to model weights, sampling code, or output distributions. The channel exploits a structural property of deterministic decoding: pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs) used in inverse-transform sampling produce a seed-dependent sequence of token-level probability intervals that can be reconstructed from the generated text alone. A sender encodes a secret message in the PRNG seed before generation; a receiver reconstructs the intervals and recovers the seed, and thus the hidden payload, by exhaustive search over the seed space. We formalize two operational modes. In the known-prompt setting, sender and receiver share the prompt, enabling exact interval reconstruction and perfect seed recovery via forced alignment. In the unknown-prompt setting, only the generated text is available; approximate interval reconstruction combined with a maximum-hit-count scoring strategy still permits reliable recovery from sufficiently long outputs. Extensive experiments across six model families and five heterogeneous text domains show that, in the known-prompt setting, full 32-bit seed recovery from the complete 2^32 candidate space achieves up to 100% accuracy, depending on model and text domain, within 300 tokens and under 35 seconds on a single GPU. In the unknown-prompt setting, recovery reaches near-perfect accuracy at 600-800 tokens in about 12 seconds. We further analyze the influence of prompting strategies, tokenization ambiguities, and sampling hyperparameters on channel reliability. Moreover, we discuss several applications of our results: First, it allows for the steganographic transmission of 32 bits, but also shows that ignorance of the prompt is not a valid security assumption.

arXiv comments
To appear in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2026)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2026 to Nov 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • This article is wrong. SynthID-style watermarking does not affect one-shot generation quality. When news about the watermarking went around a couple of months ago I too thought there must be a quality/detectability tradeoff (as there is for images), but I dug into the math more…

      MajromaxView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.