The Self-Correction Illusion: Role Relabeling Gates Explicit Error Flagging in Large Language Models — mentioned by Topfi

Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:20:46 GMT

> This is false. Perhaps you meant they have insufficient methods, or imperfect methods, but asserting none at all is facile and your links do not say that at all. I did say "no reliable internalised way to assess the accuracy of their output", which is something very specific. If that Sonnet output is reasoning traces, there are many issues with using that as a source: For one, back and forth reasoning does often correlate with less, not more accurate overall outputs in evaluations and one example could never seriously be extrapolated to be considered "reliable", i.e. happening consistently…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Self-Correction Illusion: Role Relabeling Gates Explicit Error Flagging in Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions

The Self-Correction Illusion: Role Relabeling Gates Explicit Error Flagging in Large Language Models — mentioned by Topfi